
Unveiling the first comprehensive analysis (2012, Kessler) of unsuccessful Search Fund acquisitions and a follow-up analysis by Yale (2020, Wasserstein) offering valuable insights for investors and entrepreneurs.
First comprehensive study of unsuccessful Search Fund acquisitions since the model's 1984 inception
Analyzed 22 out of 30 known unsuccessful acquisitions (73% coverage)
Conducted 29 interviews total: 15 interviews with Search Fund operators, 14 interviews with Search Fund investors
Definition of "unsuccessful": bankruptcy, no/negative return to investors, searcher release/resignation
Maintained confidentiality to ensure honest feedback from participants
Despite initial success, some searches fail to close.
A significant percentage of acquisitions result in losses for investors.
Most losses are partial, indicating some return for investors.
Total losses, with no return for investors
Searchers fail to complete an acquisition after searching.
Businesses deteriorate rapidly after acquisition.
Businesses stagnate without growth after acquisition.
The most common reason for failure, affecting 72.7% (16 cases) of the study.
Second most common theme, highlighting challenges with operational complexity and board management.
Inadequate due diligence and misalignment between the searcher's vision and the acquired company's potential.
Ranked by frequency, these themes represent the primary factors contributing to Search Fund failures.
Defined as industry growth of 5% or less
Natural disasters, 9/11, recession
Outdated offerings in changing markets
Attempted growth through acquisition in slow markets
Searcher Issues:
Board Issues:
Negative: Emotional/physical stress, relationship breakdowns/divorce, industry change necessity, network rebuilding
Positive: Long-term investor relationships, follow-on fund opportunities, valuable life lessons, professional growth
The most challenging industry, with all nine failure themes present.
This indicates vulnerability across all potential failure points.
Second most challenging, with eight of nine themes present.
Missing theme: "Inability to retain/hire adequate talent."
Most forgiving, with only five of nine themes present.
Absent themes: "Low/negative industry growth," "Complex operations," "Low gross margin," and "Inability to retain/hire adequate talent."
Proper due diligence is critical. The importance of industry selection and growth potential is paramount. Adequate capitalization, strong relationships with the board and investors, and a clear understanding of operational capabilities are all essential.
Distinguish between project failure and personal failure. Take time to process and learn from the experience. Maintain work-life balance and outside interests. Be transparent with stakeholders, and exit gracefully if things aren't working.
Most entrepreneurs take 6 months off to reflect and reset. Common next steps include roles in private equity, venture capital, consulting, or operating roles. About one-third earn above the MBA median salary after. Many remain in the entrepreneurship and search fund community. Investors often remain supportive if the entrepreneur acted ethically.
Searchfund Failures: Takeaways for Business Acquirers